Electronic transport in sub-micron square area organic field-effect transistors
F. Golmar, P. Stoliar, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso
Citation: Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103301 (2013); doi: 10.1063/1.4795014 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4795014 View Table of Contents: http://apl.aip.org/resource/1/APPLAB/v102/i10 Published by the American Institute of Physics.
Related Articles
Device performance and bias instability of Ta doped InZnO thin film transistor as a function of process pressure Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 102102 (2013) Thin-film transistors fabricated by low-temperature process based on Ga- and Zn-free amorphous oxide semiconductor Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 102101 (2013) Understanding and controlling bias-temperature instability in SiC metal-oxide-semiconductor devices induced by unusual generation of mobile ions Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 093510 (2013) Single cell in-vivo carbon nanotube device with multimodal sensing potential AIP Advances 3, 032122 (2013) Organic transistor and inverter based on assembly of organic nanowires achieved by optimizing surface morphology APL: Org. Electron. Photonics 6, 43 (2013)
Additional information on Appl. Phys. Lett.
Journal Homepage: http://apl.aip.org/ Journal Information: http://apl.aip.org/about/about\_the\_journal Top downloads: http://apl.aip.org/features/most\_downloaded Information for Authors: http://apl.aip.org/authors
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 102, 103301 (2013)
Electronic transport in sub-micron square area organic field-effect transistors
F. Golmar,1,2 P. Stoliar,1,3,4 M. Gobbi,1 F. Casanova,1,5 and L. E. Hueso1,5,a)
1CIC nanoGUNE Consolider, Tolosa Hiribidea 76, 20018 Donostia-San Sebastian, Basque Country, Spain 2I.N.T.I.-CONICET, Av. Gral. Paz 5445, Ed. 42, B1650JKA, San Martın, Bs As, Argentina 3LPS, CNRS UMR 8502, Universite Paris Sud, 91405 Orsay, France 4ECyT, Universidad Nacional de San Martın, 1650 San Martın, Argentina 5IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48011 Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain
(Received 5 January 2013; accepted 26 February 2013; published online 12 March 2013)
Scaling down organic field effect transistors to channel areas well below the micron square could improve positively its speed and integration capabilities. Here, we report a careful study of the electronic carrier transport for such nanoscale devices. In particular, we explore the validity of standard analysis for parameters extraction in this size regime. We also study the effect of the large longitudinal electric field and fringe currents, especially their influence on the ON/OFF ratio. VC 2013 American Institute of Physics. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4795014]
Organic semiconductors can be integrated as active channels in field-effect transistors (FETs), mostly with the objective of producing low-cost or flexible electronic applications.1–8 In the scientific literature, organic FETs (OFETs) are devices whose channel lengths typically range from the millimeter down to the micrometer level and very commonly have interdigitated electrodes. These geometries are necessary for producing a large, easily measurable, output current since organic semiconductors have very low carrier density. Operative frequencies for these OFETs are also limited to the kHz regime,9,10 due to the relatively low carrier mobility of the semiconductor channels (rarely much in excess of 1 cm2/Vs (Refs. 3, 6, and 11)). In this scenario, miniaturization and improvement of OFETs well down into the sub-micrometer regime are very much sough-after technological improvement. Recent reports using organic circuits show that even a relatively modest improvement in size and speed would be highly desirable for practical applications.12,13 Shortening the channel length in OFETs leads to an increase in switching speed, since this parameter is roughly inversely proportional to the square of the channel length.9 Moreover, smaller devices with active areas below 100 nm2 could be integrated at a higher density, increasing the overall functionality of a circuit per unit area. From another perspective, sub-100 nm2 devices are going to be most likely constituted by one single crystalline grain of the organic material, so the undesirable role of defects and grain boundaries on the electronic carrier transport will be removed or at least greatly decreased.14–16
However, all these possible advantages are countered by several problems. In nanometer-sized OFETs, transport is commonly dominated by the contact resistance rather than by the bulk of the organic material.17–19 In addition, reducing the organic semiconductor area in an OFET generally leads to a significant increase of the strength of the longitudinal electric field along the channel and to significant fringe currents.20–23 In this operational condition, the standard formulas for studying carrier transport in OFETs do not longer
a)Electronic mail: l.hueso@nanogune.eu.
apply and consequently, the parameters extracted from them are dubious.
In this letter, we present pentacene-based OFETs with channel areas much below the lm2 in which spurious effects in the carrier transport cannot be neglected. In this context, we propose a method for calculating a corrective form-factor for the standard expressions generally applied to transport in OFETs. The use of such corrective factor allows us to extract relevant physical parameters that are not correct without this adjustment, such as the field effect mobility, the intrinsic conductivity of the channel, and the ON/OFF ratio.
For our experiments, we fabricated bottom-gate, bottom-contact OFETs with the geometry presented in Fig. 1(a). Channel lengths (L) from 320 nm down to 120 nm were used in this study. The metal contacts (palladium: 20 nm thick) were defined by e-beam lithography (EBL) and lift-off on highly doped p-type Si substrates that act as a common gate. Channel widths were kept constant for the drain (W1: 100 nm) and source (W2: 500 nm). Different widths of the electrodes were used for making our transistors geometry as general as possible. The gate dielectric is a 150-nm-thick thermally grown SiO2 layer. Pentacene was deposited by organic-molecular beam deposition (OMBD) in UHV conditions (base pressure <1 Â 10À9 mbar; evaporation pressure <1 Â 10À8 mbar). Pentacene thickness was 58 nm, deposited (through a shadow mask) at a rate of 1 nm/min on substrates kept at room temperature and without primer. It is widely accepted that, in general, both using a primer for the gate dielectric, and functionalizing the channel electrodes largely improve the response of organic transistors.17 Nevertheless, here we choose to keep our devices as simple as possible for studying the effect of the channel area reduction. Fig. 1(b) shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of one of the devices. The electrical measurements were performed in a LakeShore probe station under vacuum (10À5 mbar) and in the dark. We used two Source-Measure Units (SMUs) of a Keithley 4200 Semiconductor Characterization System with sub-femto preamplifiers for supplying the gate voltage (VGS) and the channel bias voltage (VDS). Both the gate current (IGS) and the drain current (IDS) were measured, but only the
0003-6951/2013/102(10)/103301/5/$30.00
102, 103301-1
VC 2013 American Institute of Physics
103301-2 Golmar et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103301 (2013)
FIG. 1. (a) Scheme of the nanometric OFET showing the nominal dimensions as defined by electron-beam lithography. This specific geometry is characterized by three parameters: the channel length (L) and the width of the source (W1) and drain (W2) electrodes. (b) SEM image of fabricated metallic electrodes, showing a nanogap. (c) PSD of an AFM image of a pentacene film. From the PSD, the typical grain size can be inferred. The inset shows the AFM image of pentacene.
latter is reported here. The gate current was constantly monitored to ensure that there was no significant leak through the gate. The organic semiconductor morphology was checked by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM, inset in Fig. 1(c)). The pentacene films present pyramidal grains with a characteristic size of 300 nm, as derived from the power spectral density analysis (PSD) (Fig. 1(c)).24
In Fig. 2(a), we show the representation of IDS as a function of VDS for a transistor with a channel length of 260 nm. Curves for other channel lengths are analogous and are not shown. Nanoscale devices typically show current-voltage curves with a linear behaviour at low source-drain bias, a clear saturation at large source-drain voltages and very good
modulation for different gate voltages. These curves compare favourably with those of transistors with micrometre length channels widely available in the literature (see Refs. 6, 11, and references therein).
The modulation of the current in the semiconducting channel is clear in the transfer characteristics, in which we plot IDS versus VGS (see Fig. 2(c) for transistors with different channel lengths). As expected,25 the ON/OFF ratio is reduced with decreasing channel length, moving from more than four orders of magnitude for a 320 nm channel to less than one for transistors with 120 nm channels. Similar transistors with micrometric channel have ON/OFF ratios of six orders of magnitude.26 It is also evident from the transfer characteristics that the nanosized transistors do not switch off completely, having a relatively large IDS,OFF current (Fig. 2(b)). This is a usual feature for devices similar to those reported here (see Ref. 25 and references therein). Transfer characteristics are particularly useful for the extraction of the field-effect mobility.21,27
For the sake of clarity, we must specify the criteria followed in all the discussion. We consider the transistors to be in OFF state when the positive gate bias stops modulating the drain current; above L ¼ 300 nm, the OFF current was found to be below the sensitivity of the instrument. The ON state is considered in the linear regime (jVGS-VTj < jVDSj), where VT is the threshold voltage or voltage below which the transistor is in OFF state. In both cases, we are at the limit of the region for which the gradual channel approximation holds and the devices present little or no short channel effects, i.e., the transverse electric field generated by the gate bias is larger than the longitudinal electric field generated by the channel bias, and hereafter simply referred to as E.28,29
We first analyze the transistors in the OFF state. Representative curves showing a linear relationship between IDS,OFF (extracted from the transfer characteristics) and VDS for different channel lengths are presented in Fig. 2(b). For the geometries used here, the total current flowing through the channel is larger than the values which would be expected by considering the infinite-parallel-plate approximation. In the literature, these extra currents are commonly referred to as fringe currents.22,30 A form-factor that accounts for this difference in current can be numerically computed for our specific
FIG. 2. (a) Source-drain current (IDS) as a function of source-drain voltage bias (VDS) represented for different gate-source (VGS) voltages. The main panel shows the clear tendency to saturation of the current-voltage curves for relatively low voltage bias of around 15 V. The inset is a magnification of the main
panel for small source-drain voltages (VDS < 0.2 V). In this inset, the linear regime in the source-drain current is more evident. (b) Source-drain leakage current (IDS,OFF) as a function of the channel bias normalized by L. (c) Transfer curves or representation of the source-drain current (IDS) as a function of gate-source (VGS) for different channel lengths.
103301-3 Golmar et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103301 (2013)
IDS %
kFF
W1 L
lCiðVGS
À
VT ÞVDS
þ
IDS;OFF;
VGS
À
VT
>
VDS;
(3)
FIG. 3. (a)-(c) Color-code representation of the electrostatic potential between the source and drain electrodes, as calculated from the Laplace equation. In the figure, which represents different channel lengths, it is clear how the small channel length to channel width ratio distorts the electrostatic potential distribution. The fringe current is, therefore, affected in a similar fashion following the electrostatic potential. (d) Form factor KFF as a function of the transistor channel length. The specific values represented in the figure arise from the exact calculation of the current in the transistor geometry used in this manuscript and cannot be readily extrapolated to other geometries.
transistor geometry. This form factor kFF is the ratio between the conductance G of a conductor with the shape proposed in
Fig. 1(a) and the ideal conductance calculated in the parallel-
plate-approximation with distance between the electrodes L and width W1 (see supplemental material)37
kFFðLÞ
¼
Gproposed shapeðL; W1; W2 ¼ 5W1Þ Ginfinite-parallel-plate approximationðL; W1Þ
:
(1)
Fig. 3 shows the computed potential distributions in the chan-
nel and the values obtained for kFF as a function of the channel lengths. Then, we express the linear behavior of IDS,OFF in terms of a ohmic conductivity of the channel when the device
is in the OFF state, rOFF, by correcting the standard formula for the conductivity of a homogeneous media by kFF as
IDS;OFF
¼
kFF
Á
VDS
Á
rOFF
Á
W1 Á L
t
;
L
<
300
nm;
(2)
where t is the effective thickness of the semiconductor layer. Note that our calculation of the electrostatic potential, as the experimental results shown above, is as general as possible since we consider two metallic electrodes with different widths, W1 and W2 ¼ 5 W1. In the case of a more conventional geometry with W1 ¼ W2 ¼ 100 nm and L ¼ 220 nm, the calculation method leads to a kFF value of 3.43. In the extreme case in which W/L tends to infinite, the fringe current contribution is negligible and kFF tends to 1.
Following the characterization of the transistors in the OFF state, we can proceed with the study of the device in the ON state. The standard expression for long-channel crystalline OFETs in the linear regime has to be modified considering three different assumptions:28,31,32 first, it has to account for the lack of validity of the infinite-parallel-plate approximation previously mentioned; second, the field-effect mobility should be corrected by the longitudinal electric field;20,21 third, the introduction of IOFF as an offset. We then propose the following equation:
where VT is the threshold voltage and Ci the dielectric
capacitance of l ¼ l0FET expðb0
pthffiffieffiffiffiffiffiffigffiffiaffiffite VDS=LÞ
per unit area. accounts for the
The mobility Frenkel-Poole
dependence on the longitudinal channel electric field, being b0
the temperature-corrected field-dependent coefficient and
lF0ET the zero field mobility. The introduction of kFF must be supported by a linear de-
pendence of IDS vs. VDS. This is experimentally observed in
the low VDS region of the output characteristics presented in
the inset of Fig. 2(a). Also, a set of mathematical considerations support this procedure.33,34 Besides, the carrier density
in the accumulation layer (formed by the gate bias in the ON
state) decays in the regions of the pentacene film relatively far
(in terms of L) from the most active part of the channel. This
would confine the extension of the fringe currents. The longer
current paths, therefore with lower net contribution, would be
modified with respect to the OFF state and require higher
order corrections in the kFF. In this work, we neglect this effect. Note that kFF is a function of L and IDS,OFF is a function of VDS, even if here we are not making it explicit.
Once we have the expression for the IDS, we can differentiate it in VGS and operate accordingly to obtain
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi!
L W1CiVDS
dIDS dVGS
%
kFFl0FET
exp
b0
VDS ; L
(4)
where the left-hand side resembles the standard procedure
for extracting the field-effect mobility from the linear region of the transfer characteristics.21,27 In order to obtain
FIG. 4. Procedure to extract the zero field mobility. (a) Slope of the transfer characteristic (lkFF ¼ dIDS=dVGSðW1CiVDSÞÀ1L in log scale) as a function of the applied voltage to the semiconducting channel. The extrapolation of the curve allows the extraction of the uncorrected zero-field mobility (kFFl0FET). (b) Zero-field mobility (l0FET) as a function of the organic transistor channel length. For comparison, also kFFlF0ET and kFFl are plotted.
103301-4 Golmar et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103301 (2013)
the zero-bias field-effect mobility, we proceed in three
steps; first, we extract the slope from the linear region of
the transfer characteristics at several bias voltages; second,
lln0F½EdTIDÁSk=FdFViGsSoðWbt1aCinieVdDSfÞrÀo1mLth¼e
linpeaffiffirffiffiffiffirffieffiffigffiffiffiression f ð VDS=LÞ (Fig.
in the 4(a));
plot and
third, each value is normalized by the proper value of kFF
for each specific L (Fig. 4(b)).
This procedure allows us to extract the real values of the
zero-field mobility, dealing with the fringe current contribu-
tion that is generally overlooked when extracting organic
semiconductor mobility values (see, for example, the values
listed in Ref. 25). For the sake of comparison, in Fig. 4(b), we
represent the corrected zero-field mobility values together
with those values that would be obtained without taking into
account the size and shape of the metal electrodes via the
form-factor kFF. With the proposed procedure, the mobility values found (around 0.2 cm2/Vs) are consistent with the liter-
ature reports for the materials and fabrication techniques used
here. Even if the overall correction does not exceed one order
of magnitude, in our specific case, the uncorrected values are in excess of 1 cm2/Vs and unrealistic for the materials and fabrication methods reported here.11,24,35,36 Mobilities of the order of 0.01 cm2/Vs were measured in transistors with inter-
digitated geometries and channel lengths of 2 lm, fabricated
simultaneously on the same substrate and following the same procedures.21 For our nanometer-sized transistors, the depend-
ence of the zero-field mobility with L may be affected by two
factors; the detrimental effect of having an L comparable to (or smaller than) the extension of the contact region,17 and the
beneficial effect of a channel with few grain boundaries. We
hypotheses that the scaling between these two factors results
in the slowly increasing zero-field mobility we experimentally
measure below 300 nm. For micrometer-sized channels, the
grain boundaries contribution is predominant.
Combining Eqs. (2) and (3), we can derive an expression
that describes the switching capabilities of our devices below
L ¼ 300 nm, in the range for which our devices present a
strong decrease of the ON/OFF ratio (see Fig. 2(b))
rffiffiffiffiffiffiffi!
ION % 1 þ lF0ET exp b0
IOFF
rOFF
VDS L
Ci t
ðVGS
À
VT Þ:
(5)
Equation (5) emphasizes the detrimental effect of the OFF intrinsic conductivity of the organic film, while highlighting the possibility of improving the ON/OFF ratio by reducing the organic film effective thickness or by increasing the dielectric capacitance of the gate. Beside these well-known conclusions, we remark two further points which go beyond the standard treatment applied to OFETs. First, the formfactor kFF is not present in Eq. (5) indicating that the fringe currents do not play a relevant role in the ON/OFF ratio. This conclusion is actually true only when the device is in the linear regime, since otherwise a corrective factor different from kFF has to be introduced in Eq. (3) that will not compensate the kFF in the IDS,OFF. Second, due to the Frenkel-Poole-like dependence of the mobility, increasing VDS (moderately) improves the ON/OFF ratio. This conclusion has a limited practical use since VDS cannot be increased beyond the linear regime, but puts in solid ground the
influence of the activation of the mobility at high longitudinal electric fields.
In conclusion, we have reported pentacene field-effect transistors with channel lengths in the order of 100 nm and channel areas much below the lm2. The devices presented show current-voltage curves with a linear behaviour at low source-drain bias, a clear saturation at large source-drain voltages and very good modulation for different gate voltages. Transfer characteristics, in which the source-drain current is represented as a function of the gate voltage, are typically used for extracting the carrier mobility in the semiconducting channel. Here, we show how the equations commonly employed need to be treated carefully since the total current flowing in a transistor is affected by potentially large fringe currents if the channel width to channel length ratio (W/L) approaches 1. We have computed the influence of the fringe current in the mobility via a form-factor, which depends on the specific geometry of the transistor channel. Finally, we propose a general expression for the ON/OFF ratio in this kind of devices.
This work was supported by the European Union 7th Framework Programme under the European Research Council Grant Agreement No. 257654 (SPINTROS), NMP project (NMP3-SL-2011-263104- HINTS), and the Marie Curie Actions (PIRG06-GA-2009-25647, ITAMOSCINOM). This research was also partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education under Project No. MAT2009-08494 as well as by the Basque Government Program PI2011-1.
1T. Sekitani, T. Yokota, U. Zschieschang, H. Klauk, S. Bauer, K. Takeuchi, M. Takamiya, T. Sakurai, and T. Someya, Science 326, 1516–1519 (2009). 2A. L. Briseno, S. C. B. Mannsfeld, M. M. Ling, S. Liu, R. J. Tseng, C. Reese, M. E. Roberts, Y. Yang, F. Wudl, and Z. Bao, Nature 444, 913–917 (2006). 3A. Dodabalapur, Mater. Today 9, 24–30 (2006). 4J. H. Cho, J. Lee, Y. Xia, B.-S. Kim, Y. He, M. J. Renn, T. P. Lodge, and C. D. Frisbie, Nature Mater. 7, 900–906 (2008). 5E. J. Meijer, D. M. de Leeuw, S. Setayesh, E. van Veenendaal, B. H. Huisman, P. W. M. Blom, J. C. Hummelen, U. Scherf, and T. M. Klapwijk, Nature Mater. 2, 678–682 (2003). 6G. Horowitz, J. Mater. Res. 19, 1946–1962 (2004). 7S. Kola, J. Sinha, and H. E. Katz, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 50, 1090–1120 (2012). 8C. Wang, H. Dong, W. Hu, Y. Liu, and D. Zhu, Chem. Rev. 112, 2208–2267 (2012). 9M. Kitamura and Y. Arakawa, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 184011 (2008). 10A. Hoppe, D. Knipp, B. Gburek, A. Benor, M. Marinkovic, and V. Wagner, Org. Electron. 11, 626–631 (2010). 11H. Klauk, U. Zschieschang, and M. Halik, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 074514 (2007). 12E. Cantatore, T. C. T. Geuns, G. H. Gelinck, E. van Veenendaal, A. F. A. Gruijthuijsen, L. Schrijnemakers, S. Drews, and D. M. de Leeuw, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 42, 84–92 (2007). 13E. C. P. Smits, S. G. J. Mathijssen, P. A. van Hal, S. Setayesh, T. C. T. Geuns, K. A. H. A. Mutsaers, E. Cantatore, H. J. Wondergem, O. Werzer, R. Resel, M. Kemerink, S. Kirchmeyer, A. M. Muzafarov, S. A. Ponomarenko, B. de Boer, P. W. M. Blom, and D. M. de Leeuw, Nature 455, 956–959 (2008). 14S. Verlaak and P. Heremans, Phys. Rev. B 75, 115127 (2007). 15G. S. Tulevski, C. Nuckolls, A. Afzali, T. O. Graham, and C. R. Kagan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 183101 (2006). 16M. Tello, M. Chiesa, C. M. Duffy, and H. Sirringhaus, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 3907–3913 (2008).
103301-5 Golmar et al.
17P. Stoliar, R. Kshirsagar, M. Massi, P. Annibale, C. Albonetti, D. M. de Leeuw, and F. Biscarini, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 6477–6484 (2007).
18L. Burgi, T. J. Richards, R. H. Friend, and H. Sirringhaus, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 6129–6137 (2003).
19R. Joseph Kline, M. D. McGehee, and M. F. Toney, Nature Mater. 5, 222–228 (2006).
20L. Wang, D. Fine, D. Basu, and A. Dodabalapur, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 054515 (2007).
21F. Golmar, M. Gobbi, R. Llopis, P. Stoliar, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Org. Electron. 13, 2301–2306 (2012).
22L. Wang, D. Fine, T. Jung, D. Basu, H. von Seggern, and A. Dodabalapur, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 1772–1774 (2004).
23B. A. Mattis, Y. Pei, and V. Subramanian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 033113 (2005).
24H. Yanagisawa, T. Tamaki, M. Nakamura, and K. Kudo, Thin Solid Films 464–465, 398–402 (2004).
25Y. Cao, M. L. Steigerwald, C. Nuckolls, and X. Guo, Adv. Mater. 22, 20–32 (2010).
26C. D. Dimitrakopoulos and D. J. Mascaro, IBM J. Res. Dev. 45, 11–27 (2001). 27A. Salleo and R. A. Street, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 471–479 (2003). 28S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices (John Wiley &
Sons, 2006).
Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103301 (2013)
29J. N. Haddock, X. Zhang, S. Zheng, Q. Zhang, S. R. Marder, and B. Kippelen, Org. Electron. 7, 45–54 (2006).
30J. B. Lee, P. C. Chang, J. A. Liddle, and V. Subramanian, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 52, 1874–1879 (2005).
31A. R. Brown, C. P. Jarrett, D. M. de Leeuw, and M. Matters, Synth. Met. 88, 37–55 (1997).
32M. Shur, M. Hack, and J. G. Shaw, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3371–3380 (1989). 33Note that the effect of the Frenkel-Poole dependence is relatively small
(Fig. 4(a)). Accordingly, we can neglect the error introduced by neglecting the higher-order terms of the series expansion of exp(VDS1/2), particularly at low bias. We do not consider the dependence of the mobility with the carrier concentration. However, considering such dependence would not affect the linearity between IDS and VDS in the linear regime. (Ref. 34). 34P. Stallinga, H. L. Gomes, F. Biscarini, M. Murgia, and D. M. de Leeuw, J. Appl. Phys. 96, 5277–5283 (2004). 35D. Knipp, R. A. Street, A. Volkel, and J. Ho, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 347–355 (2003). 36Mobility values for transistors in different chips but with the same geometry show an typical dispersion around 20%, much lower than the correction to the mobility arising from the form-factor kFF. 37See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4795014 for the numerical procedures to calculate kFF.
Ver+/-